Skip to main content

Whisker’s latest Litter-Robot uses AI to recognize your cat’s face and poop

This automatic litter box can monitor multiple cats’ toilet habits using AI-powered cameras.

The Litter-Robot 5 Pro is the newest poop-scooping machine from Whisker, makers of the excellent Litter-Robot 4, and it brings facial recognition for your cats to the self-cleaning litter box line. The company is also introducing an optional subscription service, Whisker Plus, that monitors and tracks your kitty’s bathroom behavior over time to produce “detailed analysis of data trends,” which could help detect changes and spot issues early, according to the company.

It will cost you, though: $7.99 a month (or $79.99 a year) for the subscription to Plus and a whopping $899 for the Litter-Robot 5 Pro. It’s outfitted with two night vision-equipped, AI-powered cameras — one to scan your kitty’s visage and the other to watch its waste. 

The company also announced two other new models this week, the camera-less Litter-Robot 5 for $799 and a slightly more budget-friendly Litter-Robot Evo for $599. All three models are available for preorder now at Whisker.com and will ship on November 3rd.

The self-cleaning machines that rotate after each use and dump the waste into a sealed bin have had a hardware redesign. They now feature a new control panel with an LCD display for on-device updates, which should mean less reliance on the app or trying to decipher flashing LED lights to know what’s going on. Whisker claims the 5 series models can tell the difference between pee and poop and will dispatch the latter quicker for better odor control. They also have a larger waste bin, so you shouldn’t have to empty it as often.

The features of Litter-Robot 5 Pro include AI-powered cameras to track multiple cats and data trend analytics to detect potential issues.

The main difference between the 5 and the 5 Pro is that the Pro has cameras and works with the new Whisker PetTag ($29), an RFID tag that aids the bot in identifying pets, especially for kitties that look similar. It also doubles as a digital ID, with a QR code that someone can scan to contact you if they find your pet. Both the 5 and the 5 Pro can accommodate up to five cats, one more than the Litter-Robot 4. 

The cameras — one forward-facing camera that uses facial recognition and one interior-facing camera that watches the litter bed — are designed to provide more accurate activity tracking and help detect changes in routine. If you subscribe to Whisker Plus, you can also view and save video footage of your cat’s toilet activities — sorry, kitties, you can’t opt out.

The Litter-Robot Evo is the company’s cheapest robot at $599. It’s smaller, can accommodate up to two cats, and doesn’t have some of the fancier features of the Litter-Robot 4, such as automatic night lights or litter-level sensing. But it does have a new LCD display. The Litter-Robot 4 will continue to be sold at $699.

All the robots connect to the Whisker app, where you can initiate cycling remotely, get usage alerts, and get activity and weight tracking for each kitty. For the daily insights, trend and behavior tracking — and video footage — you need to upgrade to Whisker Plus.

Some of The Verge’s kitties will be putting these new bots to the test to see if this is AI gone too far or tech that could actually help keep your pet healthy.



from The Verge https://ift.tt/Dfxr8qZ

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Pandora Stories lets artists add commentary to their own playlists

Pandora launched Stories today, a tool that lets artists and creators add voice commentary to their own playlists. The Stories feature merges podcasts with music playlists, and is meant for artists to add context to an album, or for podcasters to experiment with new storytelling formats. The feature is part of Pandora AMP, the streaming service’s free Artist Marketing Platform that helps creators promote their work. To kick off the launch, Pandora’s prepared some Stories by artists like John Legend and Daddy Yankee, who tell listeners their personal stories interspersed between their own songs. There’s also a Stories playlist called Love Songs That Aren’t Really Love Songs , which includes commentary on individual songs like a podcast... Continue reading… from The Verge - All Posts https://ift.tt/2Xz1oNc

Instagram’s updated algorithm prioritizes original content instead of rip-offs

Image: Kristen Radtke / The Verge Instagram is making significant changes to how its system recommends content, with a focus on original content and increased distribution for smaller accounts. The slew of changes were announced by the company in a blog post today. The biggest change deals with aggregators — accounts that download or screenshot other users’ videos and photos and repost them. Sometimes aggregators will credit the original poster by tagging them in the post or caption, but often, content is wholesale ripped off with no acknowledgment, and engagement is siphoned off from the person who created the content in the first place. Instagram clearly has a problem with this and will begin removing reposted content from recommendations across the platform. The... Continue reading… from The Verge - All Posts https://ift.tt/ECgcPAU

We asked camera companies why their RAW formats are all different and confusing

When you set up a new camera, or even go to take a picture on some smartphones, you’re presented with a key choice: JPG or RAW? JPGs are ready to post just about anywhere, while RAWs yield an unfinished file filled with extra data that allows for much richer post-processing. That option for a RAW file (and even the generic name, RAW) has been standardized across the camera industry — but despite that, the camera world has never actually settled on one standardized RAW format. Most cameras capture RAW files in proprietary formats, like Canon’s CR3, Nikon’s NEF, and Sony’s ARW. The result is a world of compatibility issues. Photo editing software needs to specifically support not just each manufacturer’s file type but also make changes for each new camera that shoots it. That creates pain for app developers and early camera adopters who want to know that their preferred software will just work. Adobe tried to solve this problem years ago with a universal RAW form...