Skip to main content

Elon Musk’s DOGE ties could get his companies out of $2 billion in potential liability

Elon Musk’s expansive portfolio of companies could avoid more than $2.37 billion in potential legal liability due to his unprecedented influence over the US government, a new Senate report finds.

The figure comes from a report assembled by Democratic staff for the Senate Homeland Security permanent subcommittee on investigations (PSI) probing the impact of Musk’s closeness with President Donald Trump and creation of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) on his financial interests. The staff endeavored to quantify “the financial impact of President Trump’s delegation of power on potential liabilities and scrutiny facing Mr. Musk and his companies.” To do so, it calculated the legal exposure The Boring Company, Neuralink, SpaceX, Tesla, and xAI could face as a result of federal investigations, litigation, or regulatory actions pending as of Trump’s inauguration. The staff called the number “a credible, conservative estimate.” 

The subcommittee found that Musk and his companies were subject to 65 “actual or potential” actions across 11 agencies as of Inauguration Day, and said they were able to estimate potential financial liability for 40 of those. That includes up to $1.19 billion for Tesla’s allegedly misleading statements about its self-driving features, $281 million for Neuralink’s allegedly misleading representations about its risks, and more than $630,000 in fines for SpaceX allegedly evading rocket launch requirements, the Democratic staff claims. Many of the agencies that regulate Musk’s companies have been targets of cuts by DOGE

“Mr. Musk’s position may allow him to evade oversight, derail investigations, and make litigation disappear whenever he so chooses”

Alongside the report, PSI Ranking Member Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) sent letters to the five companies asking them to respond by May 11th about their current federal investigations and litigation, and what steps they’ve taken to keep Musk’s work with the government from influencing those proceedings. He also asks the companies to preserve related communications between company employees and federal government officials, which could become relevant in future probes. While the subcommittee has subpoena powers, the Democratic minority would need support from the Republican chair to exercise them against Musk’s companies.

“Mr. Musk’s position may allow him to evade oversight, derail investigations, and make litigation disappear whenever he so chooses—on his terms and at his command,” the report says, pointing to the former Federal Aviation Administration leader’s decision to step down well before the end of his term after clashing with Musk, whose SpaceX is regulated by the agency. 

Democratic staff says even the $2.37 billion figure “drastically understates the true benefit Mr. Musk may gain from legal risk avoidance alone as a result of his position in government.” That’s not only because of the other 25 pending actions it hasn’t been able to quantify, but also because Musk’s companies could avoid millions or billions of dollars more in legal fees and other spending they might incur if ordered to change their labor or other business practices. Nor does it include “many billions of dollars” Musk could make through new government contracts or “the competitive advantage they may gain by collecting intelligence on competitors,” they write.

On top of all that, Musk will save money from all the investigations that may never happen under a Trump administration, the staff writes in its letters to Musk’s companies. “​​The cases never filed, investigations quietly neglected, and potential witnesses silenced will be harder if not impossible to detect until Congress is provided with the information it needs.”



from The Verge https://ift.tt/h5xrYHB

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Pandora Stories lets artists add commentary to their own playlists

Pandora launched Stories today, a tool that lets artists and creators add voice commentary to their own playlists. The Stories feature merges podcasts with music playlists, and is meant for artists to add context to an album, or for podcasters to experiment with new storytelling formats. The feature is part of Pandora AMP, the streaming service’s free Artist Marketing Platform that helps creators promote their work. To kick off the launch, Pandora’s prepared some Stories by artists like John Legend and Daddy Yankee, who tell listeners their personal stories interspersed between their own songs. There’s also a Stories playlist called Love Songs That Aren’t Really Love Songs , which includes commentary on individual songs like a podcast... Continue reading… from The Verge - All Posts https://ift.tt/2Xz1oNc

Instagram’s updated algorithm prioritizes original content instead of rip-offs

Image: Kristen Radtke / The Verge Instagram is making significant changes to how its system recommends content, with a focus on original content and increased distribution for smaller accounts. The slew of changes were announced by the company in a blog post today. The biggest change deals with aggregators — accounts that download or screenshot other users’ videos and photos and repost them. Sometimes aggregators will credit the original poster by tagging them in the post or caption, but often, content is wholesale ripped off with no acknowledgment, and engagement is siphoned off from the person who created the content in the first place. Instagram clearly has a problem with this and will begin removing reposted content from recommendations across the platform. The... Continue reading… from The Verge - All Posts https://ift.tt/ECgcPAU

We asked camera companies why their RAW formats are all different and confusing

When you set up a new camera, or even go to take a picture on some smartphones, you’re presented with a key choice: JPG or RAW? JPGs are ready to post just about anywhere, while RAWs yield an unfinished file filled with extra data that allows for much richer post-processing. That option for a RAW file (and even the generic name, RAW) has been standardized across the camera industry — but despite that, the camera world has never actually settled on one standardized RAW format. Most cameras capture RAW files in proprietary formats, like Canon’s CR3, Nikon’s NEF, and Sony’s ARW. The result is a world of compatibility issues. Photo editing software needs to specifically support not just each manufacturer’s file type but also make changes for each new camera that shoots it. That creates pain for app developers and early camera adopters who want to know that their preferred software will just work. Adobe tried to solve this problem years ago with a universal RAW form...